Veer Right Weblog

A Conservative View on Politics and the World

  • cover_art_xsmall1
  • Categories

  • Archives

  • The Freedom Our Forefathers fought for must be protected.

    "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free." - Ronald Reagan

  • revised120x602
  • Advertisements

Archive for November, 2008

The Link: The Secret Relationship between Saddam and al Qaida

Posted by rightwinger on November 30, 2008

I just completed my book: The Link: The Secret Relationship between Saddam and al Qaida.

The Link provides new evidence regarding:

* Saddam and al Qaida were working together since 1990
* al Qaida was located in Iraq since 1995
* Saddam in his own words says he gave the order for the 1993 World Trade Center attack.
* An Iraqi agent met with a 9/11 hijacker prior to the 9/11 attack
* WMDs were in Iraq up until Operation Iraqi Freedom

Buy it Now, click here for a reduced rate also offered in a hard cover!!!


What you think you know about Saddam and al Qaida, you don’t.   The main stream media has deliberately not investigated the al Qaida and Saddam link in order to defame President Bush and keep a lie in tact.  The Link details the facts that Saddam was training, financing, and carrying out operations with al Qaida. The Link is based on Iraqi memos, transcripts, and documents that were recovered by our military during Operation Iraqi Freedom.

See What Others Have Said:

“As one of the great authors on this subject, Louis Fairmont has unleashed the truth about the War on Terrorism in this dynamic new book. As a Anti-Terror/Force Protection specialist, I strongly recommend this book in order to understand why the United States was fully justified in the Iraq War.  Saddam Hussein was a clear and present threat to the security of the United States and the free world.”

–  Steven J. Lucks, Captain US Navy (retired)

“The Link” provides a well-researched in-depth analysis of Sharia law, the driving force behind spread of radical Islam, and its influence on society. It is a good educational tool that should be used by Westerners who, for the most part, are completely ignorant of the grave danger that could end Western civilization as we know it.

– Khalim Massoud,President, Muslims Against Sharia

Watch the video on WMDs in Iraq in 2001

Watch the video about al Qaida being in Iraq in 1995


Posted in Al Qaeda, Terrorism | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Like it or Not this is Obama’s Market

Posted by rightwinger on November 27, 2008

The stock market has overall gone down since it was announced that Obama was elected president.   Its slightly gone up since he started announcing his economic team.   The problem is that some of them are wrapped up in this Fannie Mae bailout debacle. Lastly appointing Paul Volcker the Fed Reserve Chief appointed by President Carter is all wrong.  Talk about setting us up for high inflation and interest rates – Paul Volcker is the man.

While stocks staged a relief rally leading up to the presidential election, U.S. share indices have mostly been down ever since. Major media accounts would suggest that weak markets have revealed themselves thanks to economic indicators pointing to an unfortunate economic outlook.

The above is an easy explanation, but it’s also a faulty one. If we ignore how inaccurate are the measures of economic health calculated by the federal government, it should also be said that they’re frequently backward looking, and as such, they’re often priced by investors well ahead of their release.

So instead of pricing in the present, stock markets are most useful for offering a snapshot of what things will look like in the future. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson surely isn’t helping the Obama market with his disastrous imposition of TARP, but then it should also be said that Barack Obama is not helping himself.

It was surely gracious of our president-elect to acknowledge that there’s only one president at a time, but the problem there is that his relative quietude until recently has allowed the media to somewhat define what an Obama economic program will look like. Judging by the overall decline in share prices since, investors aren’t impressed.

Read the full article

Posted in Economy, liberal, Obama | Tagged: , | 1 Comment »

Exposure to true information does not matter anymore | Northeast Intelligence Network

Posted by rightwinger on November 26, 2008

This was sent to me by a counter terrorism expert. The plot line will sound disturbingly real and pressing. We are in the final act. And the tape was from 1985–sounds like yesterday!

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Exposure to true information does not…“, posted with vodpod

Posted in liberal, Obama | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Master of Disaster – Paul Volcker

Posted by rightwinger on November 26, 2008

Oh no!  This is a nightmare really.  Paul Volcker is the idiot who ran the Federal Reserve during the Carter administration. Hello, 20% interest rates, runaway inflation, and 7.8 % unemployment!!! The spin here is that Volcker helped to tame inflation under ReaganThis is completely false.  He was a holdover from the Carter Administration until Reagan brilliantly appointed Alan Greenspan who led the US through the largest economic expansion in US history.

From Real Clear Markets:

A Carter appointee, Volcker’s attempts to use interest-rate increases to slay inflation in the late ‘70s were met with a great deal more inflation. By February of 1980, with the Fed funds rate at 14 percent, gold hit an all-time high of $875/ounce.

The dollar’s aforementioned fall was of course sped along by another major mistake carried out by Volcker just a few months prior. Correctly recognizing the futility of interest-rate targeting, Volcker shed the latter only to make a fateful decision that would drive the U.S. economy even further into the ditch. Put simply, in October of 1979 Volcker began a three year experiment with Milton Friedman’s monetarism.

Instead of targeting the Fed funds rate, Volcker attempted to target the quantity of money with disastrous consequences. Though inflation is surely a monetary phenomenon as Friedman long noted, with the majority of physical dollars outside these fifty states, attempts to control the quantity of dollars within these fifty states were bound to fail. To the extent that the Fed targeted various aggregates of U.S. money supply lower, this merely meant that dollars in other markets (eurodollars for instance) would fill the shortfall.

Worse, given the Fed’s efforts to control money quantity rather than rates, the Fed funds rate bounced around on a daily basis such that businesses faced an impossible task of raising capital owing to uncertainty about the rate at which they could raise capital. As Charles Kadlec and Arthur Laffer wrote at the time, “the Fed’s action reduced the viability and attractiveness of the dollar,” and as a result its policies “increased the prospects of inflation” in spite of the fact that monetarist targets “resulted in a slower growth in the measured quantity of money.” What the economy needed according to Laffer and Kadlec were “policies that lead to an excess demand for dollars relative to their supply.”

Read the article for yourself.

From NY Times:

Paul Volcker, [***Spin***]who helped tame runaway inflation during the 1980s during two terms as chairman of the Federal Reserve[***Spin***], has agreed to lead a new White House economic advisory committee for President-elect Barack Obama.

Mr. Volcker, 81, has been providing Mr. Obama advice on the economy for months. After briefly considering him for Treasury secretary, Mr. Obama instead asked Mr. Volcker to lead the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board, a panel comprised of officials from a variety of business sectors. The group is tasked with providing Mr. Obama advice for how to jumpstart the economy and stabilize the financial markets.

Read the article for yourself.

Posted in Economy, liberal, Obama | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

The First Thanksgiving: A Lesson in Spreading the Wealth Around

Posted by rightwinger on November 26, 2008

Will we ever learn from the past.  The pilgrims tried socialism and it didn’t work.  Here we are hundreds of years later trying it again.  All the Obamabots are about to find out how good they had it under Bush.  From the Heritage Foundation:

Most children learn that the Pilgrims’ salvation at Plymouth Colony stemmed from the generosity of local Indians. And while there is no doubt that the American natives did help the immigrants through some early tough times, it was not until the Pilgrims rediscovered the importance of private property that the colony began to thrive and was able to give thanks for their own blessings. When the Pilgrims first arrived, they attempted a form of, in Gov. William Bradford’s words, “community” or “commonwealth .” In other words, they attempted to “spread the wealth around” by destroying private property and replacing it with a communally owned property system.

The result was disastrous. According to Bradford, this system bred “confusion and discontent” and “retarded much employment that would have been to [the settlers’] benefit and comfort.” Unable to produce their own food, some settlers “became servants to the Indians,” cutting wood and fetching water in exchange for “a capful of corn .” It was not until the colony changed course and allowed the private ownership of farmland that prosperity returned. Bradford reported, “This had very good success for it made all hands very industrious. … [M]uch more corn was planted than otherwise would have been. … Women went willingly into the field, and took their little ones with them to set corn.”

A profoundly religious man, Bradford saw the hand of God in the Pilgrims’ economic recovery. Their success, he observed, “may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato’s and other ancients and applauded by some of later times … that the taking away of property … would make [men] happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God.” Bradford surmised, “God in his wisdom saw another course fitter for them.

Amen to that.

Posted in Economy, liberal, Obama | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

Clinton nomination anti-constitutional?

Posted by rightwinger on November 26, 2008

Now is MS”OBama”NBC priming the pump so to speak to bring light that its unconstitutional for Hillary to be Secretary of State, but we’ll do it anyway and just lower the salary of the position to get around the Constitution.  Obama’s team knows that on December 5 the Supreme Court is going to review whether it is constitutional for Obama to be considered a natural born citizen as described in Article II of the Constitution.  I think this story just shows how the media is going to try to spin the December 5th ruling if it goes against Obama.   I can hear David Axelrod now – ‘so about that eligibility to be the President of the United States, it doesn’t really matter. The people voted and the Constitution is an over 200 year old document, so this once we’ll just overlook the Constitution.’  This God given Constitution that was written by our founders and made this country the greatest nation on the face of the earth.  If Barack Obama stays President of the United States, this country will be a banana republic.

Vodpod videos no longer available.

more about “Clinton nomination anti-constitutional?“, posted with vodpod

Posted in Hillary, Obama | Tagged: | Leave a Comment »

Meet Obama’s Economic Team

Posted by rightwinger on November 26, 2008

Posted in Economy, Obama | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Is Obama a Natural Born Citizen? No According to 1866 United States vs. Rhodes Case No. 16,151

Posted by rightwinger on November 25, 2008

If the US Supreme Court does not rule according to the Constitution, then a dangerous precedent will be set. A person with allegiance to a foreign country would be able to be the President of the United States.   Please sign this petition asking your representatives to pass a bill requiring any person that wants to run for the presidency to prove their natural born status up front and to pass a security clearance before being allowed to enter the race.

***Sign the Petition***

With this one case, we will see does the rule of law set forth by the US Constitution govern this great nation. Have we come so far as to dismiss its wisdom to allow liberal judges to legislate from the bench based on feelings?  Our founders put the requirement in Article II of the Constitution in order to protect this great nation from being weakened or attacked from within.  There is precedence in this case from a case in 1866 United States vs. Rhodes Case No. 16,151. This means that a natural born citizen has to be born in the US and both parents must be US citizens, otherwise the child would have dual citizenship and would be subject to a foreign power.

United States vs. Rhodes Case No. 16,151

That all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States; and such citizens, of every race and color, without regard to any previous condition of slavery,”

Explanation from John C. Eastman, Ph.D:

The “subject to the jurisdiction” provision must therefore require something in addition to mere birth on U.S. soil. The language of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, from which the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was derived, provides the key to its meaning. The 1866 Act provides: “All persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed, are hereby declared to be citizens of the United States.”[3] As this formulation makes clear, any child born on U.S. soil to parents who were temporary visitors to this country and who, as a result of the foreign citizenship of the child’s par­ents, remained a citizen or subject of the parents’ home country was not entitled to claim the birth­right citizenship provided by the 1866 Act.

Read the article for yourself.

Article II

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.

The following case is before the US Supreme Court challenging Obama’s natural citizenship

United States Supreme Court docket no. 08A407, Donofrio v. Wells, is now “Distributed for Conference of Dec. 5th, 2008″ to the full Court meeting in private on that date. The case was the subject of previous sabotage by SCOTUS stay clerk, Danny Bickell (as well as judicial misconduct by NJ Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino). Bickell, after receiving the emergency stay application which requested extraordinary relief to stay the national election, took it upon himself to deny the application on the very time sensitive date it was filed, Nov. 3, a day before the election day popular vote.

Read the article for yourself.

Barack Obama’s own web site is claiming that we had dual citizenship.  Because his father was Kenyan he was a British subject; therefore, Obama held a dual citizrnship of Us and British.  There are other factors was he indeed born on US soil and was his Mother a US citizen.  The laws were different when Obama was born.  It was not as simple as my Mom was born in America so I am a US citizen.  Barack Obama’s web site says the following:

“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.

Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1982.”


Posted in liberal, McCain-Palin, Obama, Terrorism | Tagged: , , , | 4 Comments »

Obama’s Senate bill 2433

Posted by rightwinger on November 23, 2008

***Please sign the petition!***

It is interesting that Barack Obama has not once mentioned his Senate bill 2433 while campaigning.  It appears Obama’s presidential agenda is the same as the UN Millennium Development Goals.  Its as if his agenda was taken from the UN’s.   All of his radical agenda can be wrapped up in this one bill:

  • National Civilian Security Force
  • Cap and trade which means high taxes on all traditional forms of energy which will severely affect jobs and every American’s standard of living.
  • Loss of gun rights under the second Amendment
  • Large global subsidies to nations worldwide that the US has no security, military, or economic interest in.  Essentially this is welfare for the world equaling 0.7 of our GNP, an estimated $850 billion.
  • The creation of a U.N. International Criminal Court having the power to try and convict American citizens and soldiers without any protection from the U.S. Constitution.
  • A standing United Nations Army forcing U.S. soldiers to serve under U.N. command.
  • Unilaterally disarm

Senator Obama has sponsored Senate bill 2433 which states the following:

A bill to require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.”

Let’s look at this carefully “A bill to require the President…”. What this is saying is that no matter who is elected President in 2008, they will be required to develop and implement a strategy to meet the Millennium Development Goals. In a way it is taking control away from the electorate. We can elect someone who does not want to commit this much additional money to foreign aid, but he or she will have to because they are required. What exactly is the UN Millennium Development Goals? For one it will force the US to commit 0.7 GNP to poverty stricken nations that we have no political or economic interests in. The reality is we can throw an estimated 850 billion at this World Poverty issue and still not truly eradicate poverty. Take Viet Nam, do we actually think the communists will distribute any aid they are given?  The $850 billion comes from the fact that “At the International Conference on Financing for Development, in 2002, donor countries resolved to earmark 0.7 per cent of their gross national income to official development assistance.”  (p. 4, paragraph 15)

There are eight goals of the Millennium Development Goals:

  1. End Poverty and Hunger
  2. Universal Education
  3. Gender Equality
  4. Child Health
  5. Maternal Health
  6. Combat HIV/AIDS
  7. Environmental Sustainability
  8. Global Partnership

Now let’s take a closer look at S. bill 2433.

section 4 states that the: Millennium Development Goals include the goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, that live on less than $1 per day, cutting in half the proportion of people suffering from hunger and unable to access safe drinking water and sanitation, reducing child mortality by two-thirds, ensuring basic education for all children, and reversing the spread of HIV/AIDS and malaria, while sustaining the environment upon which human life depends.”  Essentially this means that the US will support the millineum goals 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6.

section 6 states “The 2002 National Security Strategy of the United States notes: `[A] world where some live in comfort and plenty, while half of the human race lives on less than $2 per day, is neither just nor stable. Including all of the world’s poor in an expanding circle of development and opportunity is a moral imperative and one of the top priorities of U.S. international policy.”

section 9 states: “At the summit of the Group of Eight (G-8) nations in July 2005, leaders from all eight participating countries committed to increase aid to Africa from the current $25,000,000,000 annually to $50,000,000,000 by 2010, and to cancel 100 percent of the debt obligations owed to the World Bank, African Development Bank, and International Monetary Fund by 18 of the world’s poorest nations.”

section 10 states “At the United Nations World Summit in September 2005, the United States joined more than 180 other governments in reiterating their commitment to achieve the Millennium Development Goals by 2015.”  This means that the US will provide aid to meet all of the Millineum Development Goals.

From Obama’s web site:

Fight Global Poverty: Obama and Biden will embrace the Millennium Development Goal of cutting extreme poverty around the world in half by 2015, and they will double our foreign assistance to achieve that goal. This will help the world’s weakest states build healthy and educated communities, reduce poverty, develop markets, and generate wealth.

Bottom line this bill means that the US will support the UN Millineum Goals 100%.  Let’s take a closer look at what this will mean.  From the UN Millennium Development Goals 2007:

Disarmament and non-proliferation

78. In 2006, the General Assembly launched a new process for an arms trade treaty, the first formal step towards developing common international standards for the import, export and transfer of conventional weapons. In relation to the implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All its Aspects, of 2001, I am encouraged that the Group of Governmental Experts on illicit brokering adopted in June 2006 a consensus report with concrete recommendations on promoting the development of national laws and regulations, enhancing information-sharing and cooperation among national authorities, and international cooperation and assistance for capacity-building.

From Obama’s web site Urban Policy:

Address Gun Violence in Cities: Obama and Biden would repeal the Tiahrt Amendment, which restricts the ability of local law enforcement to access important gun trace information, and give police officers across the nation the tools they need to solve gun crimes and fight the illegal arms trade. Obama and Biden also favor commonsense measures that respect the Second Amendment rights of gun owners, while keeping guns away from children and from criminals. They support closing the gun show loophole and making guns in this country childproof. They also support making the expired federal Assault Weapons Ban permanent.

This means that American’s rights to small arms under the second Amendment may be lost. Article II of the US Constitution says “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.”

79. The major challenges ahead relate to the need to strengthen multilateral norms for disarmament and arms regulation. The ultimate strategic goal of the United Nations is “general and complete disarmament under effective international control”. This goal, deriving from the mandates on disarmament and arms regulation set out in the Charter of the United Nations, will require additional efforts to promote universal participation in multilateral treaties, their full and effective implementation, the establishment of new norms, and increased engagement with civil society.

From Obama’s web site:

Set the Goal of a Nuclear-Free World: Show the world that America believes in its existing commitment under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to work to ultimately eliminate all nuclear weapons. America will not disarm unilaterally.

Rule of law

81. The rule of law is a fundamental principle on which the United Nations was established. The United Nations goal continues to be a community of nations operating according to rules that promote human rights, human dignity and the settlement of international disputes through peaceful means.  International criminal justice, a concept based on the premise that the achievement of justice provides a firmer foundation for lasting peace, has become a defining aspect of the work of the Organization.

Climate change and sustainable development

34. The year 2007 witnessed unprecedented momentum in the struggle to mitigate and adapt to climate change and to achieve the Millennium Development Goal of environmental sustainability. I have made climate change a key priority for the Organization because climate change threatens to create an environmental crisis of global proportions if it remains unchecked. In addition, overcoming climate change will contribute to the achievement of the Millennium Development Goals by 2015 alongside the wider sustainable development goals agreed at the World Summit in 2005.

From Obama’s web site:

The Obama-Biden comprehensive New Energy for America plan will:

  • Help create five million new jobs by strategically investing $150 billion over the next ten years to catalyze private efforts to build a clean energy future.
  • Within 10 years save more oil than we currently import from the Middle East and Venezuela combined.
  • Put 1 million Plug-In Hybrid cars — cars that can get up to 150 miles per gallon — on the road by 2015, cars that we will work to make sure are built here in America.
  • Ensure 10 percent of our electricity comes from renewable sources by 2012, and 25 percent by 2025.
  • Implement an economy-wide cap-and-trade program to reduce greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent by 2050.

***Please sign the petition!***

Posted in Economy, Obama | Tagged: , , | 18 Comments »

al Zawahiri insults Obama

Posted by rightwinger on November 23, 2008

As you already know al-Zawahiri, al Qaida’s number 2 man insulted Obama.  I guess al Qaida doesn’t think the One understands them.  I thought Obama was going sit down and talk with everyone, so everyone would like us now.  When will Obama set up his talk with Usama bin Laden?  I have a quote from an interview Obama had which shows how nieve Obama is on radical Islam.

CAIRO, Egypt – Al-Qaida‘s No. 2 leader used a racial epithet to insult Barack Obama in a message posted Wednesday, describing the president-elect in demeaning terms that imply he does the bidding of whites. The message appeared chiefly aimed at persuading Muslims and Arabs that Obama does not represent a change in U.S. policies.

Read the full article

Here is Obama on radical Islam, July 13, 2008:

there has been a shift in Islam that I believe is connected to the failures of governments and the failures of the West to work with many of these countries, in order to make sure that opportunities are there, that there’s bottom-up economic growth.

Read the full article

Radical Islam has nothing to do with the failure of the West or bottom-up economic growth.  It has to do with hate and being driven to have sharia law applied to all nations.  The reality is that radical Islamic terrorists seek to have sharia law in all countries of the world as well as the destruction of Israel.  Sharia law which controls all aspects of a nation (financial, religious, political, cultural) causes poverty and desperation.  The imposition of sharia law can be damaging to a society for many reasons. One is the economic depressing factors because it limits the free market. “There is ample evidence that Islamism, and its imposition of Sharia law, results in crippling limitations to economic development, and thus to the socioeconomic well-being of Muslims. Relevant cases are Pakistan, Iran, Sudan, and Nigeria.” (United States, Cong. House, 9/11 Five Years Later: Gauging Islamist Terrorism, 109 Cong., 2nd sess., 7 Sept. 2006, 29 Apr. 2008, 14.)  It is a vicious circle.

They want to kill and destroy any infidels (non-believers).  Making nice with them will not change a thing.  Obama is either completely ignorant on the subject or making it out to be.  I doubt seriously that he is ignorant on the subject.  He is just trying to rationalize terrorist behavior.  Isn’t Obama good at that.  He rationalizes Bill Ayers’ being a terrorist also.

Obama has no understanding of the roots of radical Islam. It began long before the US invaded Iraq. Although Sayyid Qutb wrote the jihadist manifesto Milestones which is commonly compared to the communist manifesto, Haj Muhammed Amin al-Husseini was the true forefather of radical Islam. Al-Husseini preceded Qutb in his radical anti-Western, anti-semitic ideals. Al-Husseini was a Nazi who worked directly with and for Hitler actively recruiting Muslims to fight in Hilter’s Army.

The scary part is that Obama is being an apologist when he needs to be strong against our enemy, radical Islam. What would have happened if we had tried to appease Hitler? We would all be speaking German now.

Read More about al-Husseini

trackback to hot air

Posted in Al Qaeda, Obama, Terrorism | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »